Sourcingmag.com Homepage



BLOGGERS
 
Dian Schaffhauser [737]  RSS  Dian Schaffhauser's Biography
Nari Kannan [111]  RSS  Nari Kannan's Biography
Karen Watterson [70]  RSS  Karen Watterson's Biography
Zinnov [43]  RSS  Zinnov's Biography
Emmy Gengler [25]  RSS  Emmy Gengler's Biography
Jason Creighton [17]  RSS  Jason Creighton's Biography
Vinod Kumar [16]  RSS  Vinod Kumar's Biography
Staff [16]  RSS 
Peter Allen [14]  RSS  Peter Allen's Biography
Brian Dear [13]  RSS  Brian Dear's Biography
Glen Stidolph [9]  RSS  Glen Stidolph's Biography
Rajesh Dhuddu [9]  RSS  Rajesh Dhuddu's Biography
Stephen Guth [6]  RSS  Stephen Guth's Biography
Nipun Sehgal [5]  RSS  Nipun Sehgal's Biography
Ravi Datar [4]  RSS  Ravi Datar's Biography
Akshay Upadhye [4]  RSS  Akshay Upadhye's Biography
Bob D'Amico [3]  RSS  Bob D'Amico's Biography
Uttiya Dasgupta [2]  RSS  Uttiya Dasgupta's Biography
Michael Young [1]  RSS  Michael Young's Biography


CATEGORIES
 
ADM / IT [21]  RSS
BPO [81]  RSS
Call Centers [59]  RSS
Companies [49]  RSS
Cool Tools [41]  RSS
F&A [10]  RSS
General [969]  RSS
Globalization [96]  RSS
HRO [15]  RSS
Jobs [8]  RSS
Offshoring [147]  RSS
Research [86]  RSS
The Buzz [21]  RSS
The Funhouse [13]  RSS


RECENT ENTRIES RSS
 
Yahoo outsourcing to Google by Jason Creighton


BLOG ARCHIVE RSS
 



LATEST COMMENTS
 
Call Centers in China
by : carol wolf
 


 Ad Links
 
 

17 October 2006 by Dian Schaffhauser
Printable version  |  Email to a friend

Bringing IT Services Back In-house

Fascinating Webcast last week that I tuned into. Consulting firm Compass analyst Geraldine Fox presented the session, which examined insourcing -- repatriation of functions after you've outsourced them.

What drives a company to explore bringing activities -- particularly IT -- back in house after a stint of outsourcing?

She says the major driver is price. "They're concerned that outsourcing is costing them more than they anticipated."

Although organizations "continue to save 10%-15% in year one," she said, "what we're finding in a deal that is more than three years old, we're finding gaps of anywhere between 10%-40% over prevailing market prices. These results may seem shocking. With our conversations with executives, they already instinctively know that outsourcing is more expensive -- for certain organizations -- than performing the services themselves in house. What they find is, over time, rather than decreasing, their actual budget is increasing. To some extent, this is dependent on how the client manages the deal."

She points out, "In many cases, what we've seen is that these organizations have had unrealistic expectations to begin with."

That brings up a major challenge with insourcing. If a company is unrealistic walking into outsourcing, will it also be unrealistic in taking on repatriation?

Advises Fox, "Evaluate whether your organization is in a position to become a 'best performing' company. Will executives be willing to make the investment to [put your operation] in line with best-performing organizations?"

For advice on how to get insourcing right, listen to the Webcast yourself, here.

http://www.compassmc.com/North_America/sourcing_focus.htm

 
General
posted by Dian Schaffhauser  at  0:38 AM ET | comments [3]


BLOG COMMENT

posted by  order taking  [ http://callcenter.ramshyam.com/order-taking.htm ] 17 October 2006 at 3:17 AM ET
Outsourcing will still prevail to be advantageous to msot companies. Once work is outsourced companies can concentrate on increasing their regular business and so this is going to be beneficial in the long run. For outsourcing voice, chat, email or back-office support, visit the website <a href="http://callcenter.ramshyam.com/order-taking.htm">Order Taking</a>
 


posted by  Alex 20 October 2006 at 3:33 PM ET
The point of the discussion seems to be that insourcing is part of a more nuanced approach to service management, whereby clients define their requirements and capabilities to determine what should be outsourced and what should be kept in-house. So it's not an either/or proposition.
 


posted by  toys 24 November 2007 at 12:09 PM ET
This is a really interesting discussion. I see how outsourcing can seem like it would save a good amount of money upfront—you can eliminate positions, restructure your business to focus on more important goals, and generally free up a lot of time and resources to handle what’s important instead of support functions like IT. At the same time, though, it’s obviously going to cost a good bit of money to have another company do all of this grunt work for you, and I can see where that company would expect to be paid very well for their services. But I wonder about the cost of bringing these services back in-house. New employees might have to be hired, new space for them allocated, etc. When you take that into account, does it really make it cheaper to do the work yourself? I’m not so sure….
 



Comments currently disabled on this Blog system. We're sorry for the inconvenience.