Sourcingmag.com Homepage



BLOGGERS
 
Dian Schaffhauser [737]  RSS  Dian Schaffhauser's Biography
Nari Kannan [133]  RSS  Nari Kannan's Biography
Karen Watterson [70]  RSS  Karen Watterson's Biography
Zinnov [43]  RSS  Zinnov's Biography
Emmy Gengler [26]  RSS  Emmy Gengler's Biography
Jason Creighton [19]  RSS  Jason Creighton's Biography
Vinod Kumar [16]  RSS  Vinod Kumar's Biography
Staff [16]  RSS 
Peter Allen [14]  RSS  Peter Allen's Biography
Brian Dear [13]  RSS  Brian Dear's Biography
Glen Stidolph [9]  RSS  Glen Stidolph's Biography
Rajesh Dhuddu [9]  RSS  Rajesh Dhuddu's Biography
Stephen Guth [6]  RSS  Stephen Guth's Biography
Nipun Sehgal [5]  RSS  Nipun Sehgal's Biography
Ravi Datar [4]  RSS  Ravi Datar's Biography
Akshay Upadhye [4]  RSS  Akshay Upadhye's Biography
Bob D'Amico [3]  RSS  Bob D'Amico's Biography
Uttiya Dasgupta [2]  RSS  Uttiya Dasgupta's Biography
Michael Young [1]  RSS  Michael Young's Biography


CATEGORIES
 
ADM / IT [22]  RSS
BPO [103]  RSS
Call Centers [78]  RSS
Companies [61]  RSS
Cool Tools [56]  RSS
F&A [13]  RSS
General [989]  RSS
Globalization [118]  RSS
HRO [18]  RSS
Jobs [8]  RSS
Offshoring [161]  RSS
Research [108]  RSS
The Buzz [26]  RSS
The Funhouse [13]  RSS


RECENT ENTRIES RSS
 


BLOG ARCHIVE RSS
 



LATEST COMMENTS
 
 


 Ad Links
 
iSixSigma Live! Save up to $700
 

3 January 2008 by Nari Kannan
Printable version  |  Email to a friend

Measuring The True Impact of Process Improvement

The Usual way to measure the impact of Process Improvement is to do Before and After measurements.

However here is a recent study that says, that doing just a Before and After measurement may be underestimating the true impact of Process Improvement. Here is the abstract of the study, The competitive impact of service process improvement: Examining customers’ waiting experiences in retail markets by Piyush Kumar of the University of Georgia.

Piyush Kumar contends that in competitive retail markets any Process Improvement implemented by one competitor not only increases Customer Satisfaction at that competitor but increases Customer Dissatisfaction at the Competitor’s also. This is what Piyush Kumar means by underestimating!

Very interesting findings! This sort of agrees with the way Kano Analysis is used to determine product or service features needed. Kano Analysis usually points to the fact that any feature or service innovation that is offerred as a Bonus or Additional Feature becomes an expected feature as time goes on.

Five years ago, airbags in cars used to be only for the driver. Now additional airbags for the driver and passengers are slowly becoming standard in all cars! Similarly GPS based Navigation devices are special accessories in most cars. Five years ago they used to be found only in the most expensive cars. Five years from now they will become standard equipment!

Service Processes and Improvement in such processes also become expected from all competitors when one competitor implements it! This Christmas Season, Wal-Mart actively advertised that they have added additional people at the checkouts so that there would be minimal waiting time at the checkout counters! They must have seen their competitors advertising that at their stores there is no waiting time!

What this means is that Continuous Process Improvement in services may be very important, even if one of your competitors gets the ball rolling!

The ability to learn faster than your competitors may be only sustainable competitive advantage - Arie de Geus

 
Blogger Bios , BPO , Call Centers , Globalization , Offshoring , Research
posted by Nari Kannan  at  8:30 PM ET | comments [0]


BLOG COMMENT


Comments currently disabled on this Blog system. We're sorry for the inconvenience.